Annonce

Réduire
Aucune annonce.

Les USA se preparent pour attaquer l'Iran

Réduire
X
 
  • Filtre
  • Heure
  • Afficher
Tout nettoyer
nouveaux messages

  • Les USA se preparent pour attaquer l'Iran

    Paul Craig Roberts Special to Salem-News.com Washington is getting all of us in over our heads.
    (WASHINGTON D.C.) - Only the blind do not see that the US government is preparing to attack Iran. According to Professor Michel Chossudovsky, “Active war preparations directed against Iran (with the involvement of Israel and NATO) were initiated in May 2003.”
    Washington has deployed missiles directed at Iran in its oil emirate puppet states, Oman and the UAE, and little doubt in the other US puppet states in the Middle East. Washington has beefed up Saudi Arabia’s jet fighter force. Most recently, Washington has deployed 9,000 US troops to Israel to participate in “war games” designed to test the US/Israeli air defense system. As Iran represents no threat unless attacked, Washington’s war preparations signal Washington’s intention to attack Iran.
    Another signal that Washington has a new war on its agenda is the raised level of Washington’s rhetoric and demonization of Iran. Judging by polls Washington’s propaganda that Iran is threatening the US by developing a nuclear weapon has met with success. Half of the American public support a military attack on Iran in order to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear capability. Those of us who are trying to awaken our fellow citizens start from a deficit that the minds of half of the US population are under Big Brother’s control.
    As the International Atomic Energy Agency’s reports from its inspectors on the ground in Iran have made clear for years, there is no evidence that Iran has diverted any enriched uranium from its nuclear energy program. The shrill hype coming from Washington and from the neoconservative media is groundless. it is the same level of lie as Washington’s claim that Saddam Hussein in Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Every US soldier who died in that war died in behalf of a lie.
    It could not be more obvious that Washington’s war preparations against Iran have nothing to do with deterring Iran from a nuclear weapon. So, what are the war preparations about?
    In my judgment, the US government’s war preparations are driven by three factors. One is the neoconservative ideology, adopted by the US government, that calls for the US to use its superior military and economic position to achieve world hegemony. This goal appeals to American hubris and to the power and profit that it serves.
    A second factor is Israel’s desire to eliminate all support for the Palestinians and for Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. Israel’s goal is to seize all of Palestine and the water resources of southern Lebanon. Eliminating Iran removes all obstacles to Israel’s expansion.
    A third factor is to deter or slow China’s rise as a military and economic power by controlling China’s access to energy. It was China’s oil investments in eastern Libya that led to the sudden move against Libya by the US and its NATO puppets, and it is China’s oil investments elsewhere in Africa that resulted in the Bush regime’s creation of the United States Africa Command, designed to counter China’s economic influence with US military influence. China has significant energy investments in Iran, and a substantial percentage of China’s oil imports are from Iran. Depriving China of independent access to oil is Washington’s way of restraining and boxing in China.
    What we are witnessing is a replay of Washington’s policy toward Japan in the 1930s that provoked the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Japan’s bank balances in the West were seized, and Japan’s access to oil and raw materials was restricted. The purpose was to prevent or to slow Japan’s rise. The result was war.
    Despite the hubris in which it wallows, Washington understands the vulnerability of its Fifth Fleet in the Persian Gulf and would not risk losing a fleet and 20,000 US naval personnel unless it was to gain an excuse for a nuclear attack on Iran. A nuclear attack on Iran would alert both China and Russia that they could suffer the same fate. The consequence would be that the world would face a higher risk of nuclear armageddon than existed in the mutually assured destruction of the US-Soviet standoff.
    Washington is getting all of us in over our heads. Washington has declared the “Asia-Pacific” and the South China Sea to be areas of “America’s national interest.” What sense does this make? It makes the same sense as if China declared the Gulf of Mexico and the Mediterranean Sea to be areas of China’s national interest.
    Washington has deployed 2,500 Marines, promising more to come, to Australia in order to do what? Protect Australia from China or occupy Australia? Encircle China with 2,500 Marines? It would not mean anything to China if Washington deployed 25,000 Marines in Australia.
    When you get right down to it, Washington’s tough talk is nothing but a silly pointless provocation of Washington’s largest creditor. What if Washington’s idiocy causes China to worry that Washington and its UK and European puppets will seize its bank balances and refuse to honor China’s holdings of $1 trillion in US Treasury bonds? Will China pull its balances from the weak US, UK, and European banks? Will China decide to strike first, not with nuclear weapons, but by selling its $1 trillion in Treasury bonds all at once?
    It would be cheaper than war.
    The Federal Reserve would have to quickly print another $1 trillion dollars with which to buy the bonds, or US interest rates would shoot up. What would China do with the $1 trillion in newly printed paper? In my opinion, China would dump it all at once in the currency market, because the Federal Reserve cannot print euros, UK pounds, Japanese yen, Swiss francs, Russian rubles, and Chinese yuan with which to buy up its newly printed currency.
    The US dollar would take a beating. US import prices–which now include, thanks to offshoring, almost everything Americans consume–would rise. The hard-pressed 90% would take a further beating, endearing their Washington oppressors to them to an even greater extent. The rest of the world, anticipating nuclear war, would flee the dollar, as Washington would be a primary attack target.
    If the missiles aren’t launched, Americans would wake up the next day a bankrupt third world country. If the missiles were launched, few Americans would wake up.
    We, as Americans, need to ask ourselves what all this is about? Why is our government so provocative toward Islam, Russia, China, Iran? What purpose, whose purpose is being served? Certainly not ours.
    Who benefits from our bankrupt government starting yet more wars, picking this time not on defenseless countries like Iraq and Libya, but on China and Russia? Do the idiots in Washington think the Russian government does not know why Russia is being surrounded with missile bases and radar systems? Do the Washington morons really believe that the Russian government will fall for its lie that the missiles are directed against Iran? Only American idiots who sit in front of Fox “news” could possible believe that the real issue is an Iranian nuclear weapon.
    How much longer will the Russian government permit the US National Endowment for Democracy, a CIA front, to interfere in its elections by financing opposition parties led by the likes of Vladimir Kara-Murza, Boris Nemtsov, and Alexei Navalny, who organize protests of every election that Putin’s party wins, alleging without any evidence whatsoever, but providing propaganda for Washington, who no doubt pays well, that the election will be and was stolen?

    In the US, such activists would be declared to be “domestic extremists” and be subjected to rough treatment. In Amerika even anti-war activists are subjected to home invasions by the FBI and grand jury investigations.
    What this means is that “the criminal state of Russia” is a more tolerant democracy than the US, or for that matter, Amerika’s puppet states in Europe and the UK.
    Where do we go from here? If not to nuclear destruction, Americans must wake up. Football games, porn, and shopping malls are one thing. Survival of human life is another. Washington, that is, “representative government,” consists only of a few powerful vested interests. These private interests, not the American people, control the US government.
    That is why nothing that the US government does benefits the American people.
    The current crop of presidential contenders, except for Ron Paul, represent the controlling interests. War and financial fraud are the only remaining American Values.
    Will Americans again give the sheen of “democracy” to rule by a few by participating in the coming rigged elections?
    If you have to vote, vote for Ron Paul or for a more extreme third party candidate. Show that you do not support the lie that is the system.
    Stop watching television. Stop reading newspapers. Stop spending money. When you do any of these things, you are supporting evil.


    Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during President Reagan's first term. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. He has held numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon Chair, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, and Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He was awarded the Legion of Honor by French President Francois Mitterrand.
    He is the author of The Costs of War: International Law, the UN, and World Order after Iraq; Alienation and the Soviet Economy: The Collapse of the Socialist Era, and is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of The Tyranny of Good Intentions: How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name of Justice.

    globalresearch.ca
    Dernière modification par hiemsal, 15 janvier 2012, 22h17.
    ...et maintenant?

  • #2
    Only the blind do not see that the US government is preparing to attack Iran.
    So that oil prices spike on the one hand, and president obama to be naturally re-elected, as american people do believe with hard evidence that the commander in chief can't be changed in times of war, on the other hand.

    Traduction: une astuce pour faire réélire obama et booster les prix du pétrole.
    Kindness is the only language that the deaf can hear and the blind can see - Mark Twain

    Commentaire


    • #3
      une attaque contre l iran peut provoquer la 3 eme guerre mondiale.
      c est ce que ont dit les russes et les russes.
      sinon les usa aurait frapper depuis longtemps.

      Commentaire


      • #4
        So that oil prices spike on the one hand, and president obama to be naturally re-elected, as american people do believe with hard evidence that the commander in chief can't be changed in times of war, on the other hand.
        relevant analysis. Nevertheless, there are more deeper economic and global politics issues.
        C'est tres interessant de voire comment l'histoire se repete. Les " IR US realists" qu'on appelle les "Neo-conservateur" ou bien les Faucans ( the Hawks), impriment aux USA une ideologie tres dangereuse. L'exemple de l'accaparation des reserves financieres Japonaises dans les annees 30 est edifiant . ce qui a conduit celle ci a ...Pearl Harbour...et la suite est fameuse.
        ...et maintenant?

        Commentaire


        • #5
          Hiemsal, your signature is so relevant too ! with a gun you are to survive, even if the rest of the world has to go ........ no matter if with extreme prejudice
          Kindness is the only language that the deaf can hear and the blind can see - Mark Twain

          Commentaire


          • #6
            Hiemsal, your signature is so relevant too ! with a gun you are to survive, even if the rest of the world has to go ........ no matter if with extreme prejudice

            this topic is a Perfect context to say something about "Al Capone devise" !
            En effet, cette phrase nous ramene a la base des relations internationales et de la geo-politique dont les instruments principaux sont: 1- la force 2- la diplomatie. La diplomatie ( a polite word) n'est absolument rien sans l'appui de la force ( a gun). Le diplomate vrai possede toujours dans sa poche un cheque signe par ces ...Forces Armees.
            ...et maintenant?

            Commentaire


            • #7
              Mon problème, c'est qu'on dit toujours après coup ....air force won
              Kindness is the only language that the deaf can hear and the blind can see - Mark Twain

              Commentaire


              • #8
                Mon problème, c'est qu'on dit toujours après coup ....air force won
                On m'a raconte que pendant une inspection le chef de notre ANP Gaid salah, qui est un parfait esprit de biffin, excede par les demandes de privileges des pilotes, a ces yeux trop exageres,leurs a dit: aller installer vos foutues bases dans l'espace aerien...la terre elle est a moi.

                It was China’s oil investments in eastern Libya that led to the sudden move against Libya by the US and its NATO puppets
                Dans la derniere brochure de la nouvelle Doctrine de defense Americaine, le Pacifique et la mer de Chine sont etablis comme les priorites de la strategie US. La Chine fait peur...
                Dernière modification par hiemsal, 15 janvier 2012, 23h51.
                ...et maintenant?

                Commentaire


                • #9
                  une attaque contre l iran peut provoquer la 3 eme guerre mondiale.
                  Le scenario d'escalade pouvant atteindre la dimension de Guerre Mondiale a ete joue durant la preparation US-Israel depuis 2003. Vigilant Shield 07. impliquant la Chine, la Russie, et la Coree du Nord...autour de l'Iran.
                  ...et maintenant?

                  Commentaire


                  • #10
                    c'est très peu probable. Il n’attaqueront pas l'iran maintenant.

                    Commentaire


                    • #11
                      une attaque contre l iran peut provoquer la 3 eme guerre mondiale.
                      Pour provoquer une guerre mondiale il faudra attaquer la Biélorussie ou à degrés moins le Kazakhstan, là la Russie va rentrer en guerre avec la Chine contre l'Occident... Sinon pour un Iranien ou un Syrien le Russe ne mourra pas à cause d'eux.
                      Pas à la tique ..

                      Commentaire


                      • #12
                        Il y a un enigme ici.
                        Quelle serait la position de l'inde avec ses 1m300millions d'habitants, quand même c'est une puissance et le conflit est pas loin
                        La haine aveugle

                        Commentaire


                        • #13
                          une attaque contre l iran peut provoquer la 3 eme guerre mondiale.
                          c est ce que ont dit les russes et les russes.
                          sinon les usa aurait frapper depuis longtemps.
                          Ça relève de la science-fiction. Mais une guerre régionale n'est peut être pas à écarter, le Moyen Orient risque de s'embraser : pays du Golfe, Liban, Syrie, Israël, Chiites d'Irak...

                          Il y a un enigme ici.
                          Quelle serait la position de l'inde avec ses 1m300millions d'habitants, quand même c'est une puissance et le conflit est pas loin
                          Je pense que l'Inde penchera naturellement vers les États Unis. Il y a une grande méfiance entre l'Inde et la Chine. L’Inde a énormément de troupes positionnés aux long des frontières, voilà deux pays qui sont condamnés à être rivaux. Il y a déjà eu une guerre entre eux dans les années 60.

                          Commentaire


                          • #14
                            En meme temps attaquer les iraniens en plein hiver, ca peut etre jouable, puisque la reaction de la DCA sera un poil ralenti, mais les bombardier risquent aussi de se planter vu la meteo qui doit regner en ce moment.
                            "Le patriotisme c'est l'amour des siens. Le nationalisme c'est la haine des autres". Romain Gary

                            Commentaire


                            • #15
                              En meme temps attaquer les iraniens en plein hiver, ca peut etre jouable, puisque la reaction de la DCA sera un poil ralenti, mais les bombardier risquent aussi de se planter vu la meteo qui doit regner en ce moment.
                              Dans l'immediat ce n'est pas possible, quand exactement personne ne peut le dire...une annee, 6 mois, deux ans. Plusieurs parametres vont etre consideres...
                              Je pense que l'Inde penchera naturellement vers les États Unis. Il y a une grande méfiance entre l'Inde et la Chine. L’Inde a énormément de troupes positionnés aux long des frontières, voilà deux pays qui sont condamnés à être rivaux. Il y a déjà eu une guerre entre eux dans les années 60.
                              les Amerloques n'ont pas besoin de l'Inde pour faire leur guerre. En plus, l'Inde a une tradition des pays non-alignes, elle ne soutiendra pas les USA, ni leurs adversaires...lInde , selon des etudes prospectives serieuses, depassera la Chine en puissance economique et militairea l'horizon ...2040.
                              L'affirmation de soi est la capacité à exister sans crainte d'être vu et sans avoir besoin de se
                              mettre en avant.

                              Commentaire

                              Chargement...
                              X