Annonce

Réduire
Aucune annonce.

Quelle compétitivité durable au Maroc ?

Réduire
X
 
  • Filtre
  • Heure
  • Afficher
Tout nettoyer
nouveaux messages

  • Quelle compétitivité durable au Maroc ?

    Le Think Tank suisse SolAbility vient de publier le récent rapport de la compétitivité durable dans le monde 2015. Quel positionnement du Maroc sur le plan mondial et régional ?

    Les Echos
    Dernière modification par zek, 31 janvier 2016, 07h49.
    Si vous ne trouvez pas une prière qui vous convienne, inventez-la.” Saint Augustin

  • #2
    Alors les makznito un commentaire ?
    « Great minds discuss ideas; average minds, events; small minds, people. » Eleanor ROOSEVELT

    Commentaire


    • #3
      Think Tank suisse SolAbility
      Ils ont over-thinker pour aboutir à ce classement satirique :

      Compétitivité....


      l’Arabie Saoudite 36e
      Israël 62e
      les Émirats arabes unis 120e

      Commentaire


      • #4
        - Arabie Saoudite: 36

        - Qatar: 67

        - Algérie: 74

        - Koweït: 108

        - Liban: 110

        - Émirats arabes: 120

        - Tunisie: 122

        - Égypte: 127

        - Maroc: 133

        Commentaire


        • #5
          Methodology
          The Sustainable Competitiveness Model

          The three-dimensional sustainability model of reconciling the economy, the environment and the society is often used and applied in the corporate world to evaluate and manage sustainability issues and performance.

          However, corporations are entities that operate in very different boundaries and with different goals than states and nation-economies. The elements of the model therefore have to be adapted to the characteristics of nations and their fundament of sustained prosperity.

          While corporate or economic entities (depending on the nature of their business) are working with natural capital, they do not depend on the location of the capital (natural, human, financial) they utilize, and therefore can move their operations to where the external conditions are most favourable, both in terms of physical location (offices/factories) and markets, as well as in terms of business fields. Transport and international trade have made countries and people less dependent on their immediate environment through international trade of resources, including water. However, countries and population cannot simply move should fundamental resources (water, agricultural output) become scarce or the country inhabitable due to climate change. At the end of the day people rely on, and life off, the natural capital of their environment for better or worse.

          The Sustainable Competitiveness Pyramid
          Sustainable competitiveness - they ability to generate and sustain inclusive wealth and dignifying standard of life for all citizens in a globalised world of competing economies, consists of 5 key elements that interact and influence each other: natural capital (the given natural environment and climate, minus human induced degradation and pollution), social capital, intellectual capital (the ability to compete in a globalised market through sustained innovation), resource management (the ability to extract the highest possible value from existing resources (natural, human, financial), and governance (the framework given, normally by government policies & investments, in which a national economy operates).



          It is now widely accepted that economic activities have adverse impacts or side-effects on the non-financial assets of a country. The negative impacts of economic activities - including negative impacts on the social fabric and cohabitation within a society - can undermine or even reverse future growth and wealth creation. Due to the omission of key non-financial indicators and performance that are fundamental to sustain economic activities, conventionally used measurements to measure wealth of nations such as the GDP have limited informative value for the future development of a country.

          Sustainable competitiveness means the ability of a country to meet the needs and basic requirements of current generations while sustaining or growing the national and individual wealth into the future without depleting natural and social capital.

          The Sustainable Competitiveness Index is built and calculated based on the sustainable competitiveness model that covers 106 data indicators grouped in 5 pillars:

          Social Cohesion is the fundamental stability required to maintain interruption-free economic activities: the health of populations, equality, security and freedom within a country

          Natural Capital is the based to sustain a society and economic activities: the given natural environment within the frontiers of a country, including availability of resources, and the level of the depletion of those resources.

          Resource Intensity is a measurement of efficiency, and thus an element of competitiveness: the efficiency of using available resources (domestic or imported) as a measurement of operational competitiveness in a resource-constraint World.

          Social Cohesion is the fundamental stability required to maintain interruption-free economic activities: the health of populations, equality, security and freedom within a country

          Sustainable Innovation is key to sustain economic development in the globalised market: the capability of a country to generate wealth and jobs through innovation and value-added industries in the globalised markets
          The Governance framework is the environment businesses and a national economy are operating in. It is key to future development, not only for software, but also hardware.



          Competitiveness Indicators
          The sustainable competitiveness model is based on a pyramid, where each level is required to support the next higher level. In the top-down direction, the different levels of the pyramid have influence the state of the lower levels.

          Natural Capital



          The natural capital is the base of the pyramid, and is defined by the characteristics of the given physical environment of a country. The natural capital consists of a mixture of size, population, geography, climate, biodiversity and availability of natural resources (renewable and non-renewable), as well as the level of depletion/degradation of the available resources. The combination of these factors and the level of depletion of the non-renewable resources due to human activity and climate change represents the potential for sustaining a prosperous livelihood for the population and the economy of a nation into the future.

          Indicators used encompass water, forest and biodiversity indicators, agricultural indicators, land degradation and desertification, minerals and energy resources, pollution indicators and depletion indicators.

          Resource Management

          The more efficient a nation is using resources (natural, human, financial), the more wealth the country is able to generate. In addition, higher efficiency means smaller negative impacts of potential supply scarcity of resources (food, energy, water, minerals). Higher efficiency is also equal to lower cost per production unit throughout all sectors, private and public. Efficient use of resources and energy is an indicator for a nation’s ability to maintain or improve living standard levels both under a future business-as-usual Indicators used cover water usage and intensity, energy usage, intensity and energy sources, climate change emissions and intensity as well as certain raw material usage. However, global data availability for raw materials consumption other than steel is limited and therefore could not be included.



          Indicators used cover water usage and intensity, energy usage, intensity and energy sources, climate change emissions and intensity as well as certain raw material usage. However, global data availability for raw materials consumption other than steel is limited and therefore could not be included.

          Social Capital

          The economy requires stability to run free of interruptions. Nations and societies therefore need a minimum level of social cohesion, coherence, and solidarity between different regions, between authorities and the people, between different interest groups, between income levels, between generations, and between individuals. A lack of social cohesion in any of the above aspects leads to social gaps that eventually lead to increased crime, violence and insecurity that can seriously undermine the stability the economy requires as a basis to thrive in the long run.



          Indictors used cover health performance indicators, birth statistics, income differences, equal opportunities (gender, economic), freedom of press, human rights considerations, the level of crime against both possession and humans, and perceived levels of well-being and happiness.

          Intellectual Capital

          The backbone of sustained economic success is the ability to continuously improve and innovate on all levels and throughout all institutions (not limited to the private sector). Sustaining competitiveness also requires a long-term view beyond momentary political interests or opinions, and long-term investments in crucial areas (education, infrastructure). Economies that are being deprived from investments sooner or later face decline, as some nations of the formerly “leading” West are currently learning the hard way. Indicators used for the innovation capability sub-index cover education levels, R&D performance indicators, infrastructure investment levels, employment indexes, and the balance of the agricultural-industrial-service sectors.



          Governance

          With the given physical environment and conditions in place, the sustained competitiveness of a country is determined by what the society and the economy is able to extract from available resources. This, in turn, is characterized by the framework provided by authorities. The framework of a country provides the basis for businesses and the social consensus. Governance indicator consist of both physical indicators (infrastructure) as well as non-physical attributes (business legislation, level of corruption, government investments, exposure to business and volatility risks, exposure to financial risks, etc.)



          Data sources
          Over 90% of the sustainable competitiveness indicators are purely quantitative performance indicators. Data sources were chosen according to reliability and availability of global data. The largest percentage of indicators was derived from the World Bank’s indicator database, followed by data sets and indicators provided by various UN agencies. In addition, some recognised external indexes published by non-governmental organisations have been integrated, including Transparency International, Reporters without Borders, The New Economics Foundation, The Institute for Economics and Peace, and The Fund For Peace.

          Commentaire


          • #6
            En image


            Commentaire


            • #7
              Ils ont over-thinker pour aboutir à ce classement satirique :

              Compétitivité....


              l’Arabie Saoudite 36e
              Israël 62e
              les Émirats arabes unis 120e
              Ce genre de classement peu crédible est malheureusement une manière d'attirer l'attention pour se démarquer des classements habituels !

              Commentaire


              • #8
                On retrouve, à peu de choses près, le classement IDH du PNUD.





                Data sources
                Over 90% of the sustainable competitiveness indicators are purely quantitative performance indicators. Data sources were chosen according to reliability and availability of global data. The largest percentage of indicators was derived from the World Bank’s indicator database, followed by data sets and indicators provided by various UN agencies. In addition, some recognised external indexes published by non-governmental organisations have been integrated, including Transparency International, Reporters without Borders, The New Economics Foundation, The Institute for Economics and Peace, and The Fund For Peace.

                Commentaire


                • #9
                  Sur les autres sous-indices, le Maroc est classé au-delà du 130e rang : le plus mauvais classement étant celui de l'efficacité des ressources (158e) avec un score de 29,5
                  avec des pays derrières le Maroc à l’instar des USA (159e), la Turquie (165e), le Koweït (179e) et la Corée du Sud ferme la marche dans la 180e position et curieusement le pays
                  qui se classe dans la première position est le Guatemala, le Kenya dans la 2e place, le Salvador en 3e position et l’Éthiopie (4e).
                  Si le Kenya, le Guatemala, le Salvador et l'Ethiopie étaient des modéles de gestion des ressource ça se saurait !

                  Les states, la Corée du Sud et le Japon sont des montres de la gestion et de l'efficacité !
                  Dernière modification par iridium, 31 janvier 2016, 20h57.

                  Commentaire


                  • #10
                    Ce genre de classement peu crédible est malheureusement une manière d'attirer l'attention pour se démarquer des classements habituels !
                    C'est ce que je pense aussi.

                    Commentaire


                    • #11
                      Le Bangladesh est ex aequo. Le Maroc doit cibler quelques indices à améliorer pour ne pas se faire doubler.

                      Commentaire


                      • #12
                        Le problème du Maroc, ce sont les inégalités. Autant il y a un Maroc utile et un Maroc inutile, y a un peuple utile et un autre non.

                        Commentaire


                        • #13
                          Autant il y a un Maroc utile et un Maroc inutile, y a un peuple utile et un autre non.
                          Peut être qu'un jour, les institutions internationales élaboreront un classement pour chacun des Maroc.

                          Commentaire


                          • #14
                            C'est bien
                            Enfin un classement ou l'Algérie est devant le Maroc ........et le mali devant honk Hong , l'Arabie saoudite devant la Corée du sud et le Pérou devant les USA
                            Allez champagne

                            Commentaire


                            • #15
                              C'est bien
                              Enfin un classement ou l'Algérie est devant le Maroc ........et le mali devant honk Hong , l'Arabie saoudite devant la Corée du sud et le Pérou devant les USA
                              Allez champagne
                              LOL


                              et c'est la première chose que les honnêtes gens auraient relevés si c'etait le Maroc qui était devant l’Algérie .....oeilfermé

                              mais bon , des gens honnêtes ....
                              " Je me rend souvent dans les Mosquées, Ou l'ombre est propice au sommeil " O.Khayaâm

                              Commentaire

                              Chargement...
                              X