Annonce

Réduire
Aucune annonce.

Sanders ne participera pas à la conférence de l'AIPAC

Réduire
X
 
  • Filtre
  • Heure
  • Afficher
Tout nettoyer
nouveaux messages

  • Sanders ne participera pas à la conférence de l'AIPAC

    Sanders ne participera pas à la conférence de l'AIPAC qui s'oppose aux «droits palestiniens fondamentaux»

    Dimanche, le leader démocrate Bernie Sanders a confirmé qu'il ne participera pas à la conférence de l'American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) et a attaqué sur sa page Twitter l'organisation pro-israélienne.

    «Le peuple israélien a le droit de vivre en paix et en sécurité. Le peuple palestinien aussi. Je reste préoccupé par la plate-forme que l'AIPAC offre aux dirigeants qui expriment le fanatisme et s'opposent aux droits fondamentaux des Palestiniens. Pour cette raison, je n'assisterai pas à leur conférence », a tweeté Sanders.« En tant que président, je soutiendrai les droits des Israéliens et des Palestiniens et ferai tout mon possible pour apporter la paix et la sécurité dans la région. »
    @BernieSanders
    As president, I will support the rights of both Israelis and Palestinians and do everything possible to bring peace and security to the region.

    The Israeli people have the right to live in peace and security. So do the Palestinian people. I remain concerned about the platform AIPAC provides for leaders who express bigotry and oppose basic Palestinian rights. For that reason I will not attend their conference.
    11:34 PM - Feb 23, 2020
    En réponse aux tweets, l'AIPAC a publié une déclaration qualifiant les remarques de Sanders de "odieuses" et "honteuses".
    Cette évolution survient quelques jours seulement après qu'une coalition d'organisations progressistes a lancé un appel encourageant les candidats démocrates à la présidentielle à ne pas participer à la conférence politique annuelle. L'une de ces organisations est IfNotNow, le groupe juif progressiste qui a affronté des candidats sur le sujet de la Palestine pendant la campagne électorale.

    "Insister pour que les droits de l'homme soient au centre de la politique étrangère américaine devient la position dominante des démocrates", a tweeté Simone Zimmerman, cofondatrice de IfNotNow, en réponse à la déclaration de Sanders, "Les politiques haineuses et dangereuses de l'AIPAC sont du passé. Bernie Sanders, une vision humaine et juste, et le mouvement qui la propulse en avant, sont l'avenir. »
    Simone Zimmerman
    @simonerzim
    Insisting that human rights be at the center of American foreign policy is becoming the mainstream position of Democrats.

    AIPAC’s hateful and dangerous policies are the past. @BernieSanders’ humane and just vision, and the movement propelling it forward, are the future. #LFG https://twitter.com/berniesanders/st...09010430189570
    Bernie Sanders
    @BernieSanders
    The Israeli people have the right to live in peace and security. So do the Palestinian people. I remain concerned about the platform AIPAC provides for leaders who express bigotry and oppose basic Palestinian rights. For that reason I will not attend their conference. 1/2
    11:55 PM - Feb 23, 2020
    Plus tôt ce mois-ci, la représentante du Minnesota, Betty McCollum, a qualifié l'AIPAC de «groupe de haine» après que l’AIPAC ait diffusé une série de publicités sur Facebook suggérant que la membre du Congrès était pire que Daesh pour avoir promu les droits des enfants palestiniens.

    "L'AIPAC prétend être une organisation bipartite, mais son utilisation du discours de haine en fait en fait un groupe de haine", a déclaré McCollum, "En armant l'antisémitisme et la haine pour faire taire le débat, l'AIPAC nargue les démocrates et se moque de nos valeurs fondamentales. J'espère que les démocrates comprennent ce qui est en jeu et prennent position parce que travailler pour faire avancer la paix, les droits de l'homme et la justice n'est pas sinistre - c'est juste. »

    La sénatrice du Massachusetts, Elizabeth Warren, a également déclaré qu'elle ne participerait pas à la conférence et l'ancien vice-président Joe Biden est le seul candidat actuel à avoir indiqué qu'il assistera à l'événement.

    Michael Arria - 24 février 2020
    mondoweiss.net

    Traduction automatique
    "Je suis un homme et rien de ce qui est humain, je crois, ne m'est étranger", Terence

  • #2
    Texte original

    Sanders won’t attend AIPAC conference, says the group opposes ‘basic Palestinian rights’

    On Sunday, Democratic frontrunner Bernie Sanders confirmed that he would be skipping this year’s American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) conference and attacked the pro-Israel organization on his Twitter page.

    “The Israeli people have the right to live in peace and security. So do the Palestinian people. I remain concerned about the platform AIPAC provides for leaders who express bigotry and oppose basic Palestinian rights. For that reason I will not attend their conference,” tweeted Sanders, “As president, I will support the rights of both Israelis and Palestinians and do everything possible to bring peace and security to the region.”

    In response to the tweets, AIPAC put out a statement calling Sanders’ remarks “odious” and “shameful.”

    This development comes just days after a coalition of progressive organizations launched an effort encouraging Democratic presidential candidates to skip the annual policy conference. One of those organizations is IfNotNow, the progressive Jewish group that has been confronting candidates over the subject of Palestine on the campaign trail.
    “Insisting that human rights be at the center of American foreign policy is becoming the mainstream position of Democrats,” tweeted IfNotNow co-founder Simone Zimmerman in response to Sanders’ statement, “AIPAC’s hateful and dangerous policies are the past. Bernie Sanders humane and just vision, and the movement propelling it forward, are the future.”

    Earlier this month, Minnesota Rep. Betty McCollum called AIPAC a “hate group” after it ran a series of Facebook ads implying that the congresswoman was worse than ISIS for promoting the rights of Palestinian children. “AIPAC claims to be a bipartisan organization, but its use of hate speech actually makes it a hate group,” said McCollum, “By weaponizing anti-Semitism and hate to silence debate, AIPAC is taunting Democrats and mocking our core values. I hope Democrats understand what is at stake and take a stand because working to advance peace, human rights, and justice is not sinister – it is righteous.”

    Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren has also stated she will skip the conference and former vice president Joe Biden is the only current candidate who has indicated he will definitely attend the event.

    Michael Arria on February 24, 2020
    Michael Arria is the U.S. correspondent for Mondoweiss.
    "Je suis un homme et rien de ce qui est humain, je crois, ne m'est étranger", Terence

    Commentaire


    • #3
      Le seul candidat qui ait des burnes pour de vrai...

      Je crois qu'il gagnera l'investiture démocrate mais il sera une trop belle proie pour la grande gueule puante de Trump.

      Commentaire


      • #4
        Oui. Même investi par le parti démocrate, Sanders ne sera sûrement pas élu.
        L'important dans l'affaire, c'est qu'un candidat à l'investiture pour les élections présidentielles aux USA ainsi que des membres du Congress et autres femmes et hommes politiques US de premier plan critiquent ouvertement l'AIPAC et affirment leur soutien aux droits des Palestiniens.
        "Je suis un homme et rien de ce qui est humain, je crois, ne m'est étranger", Terence

        Commentaire


        • #5
          ca va on sait maintenant , qu'il ne sera jamais président ........ vivement 2024 qu'on entende plus parler de Trump
          " Je me rend souvent dans les Mosquées, Ou l'ombre est propice au sommeil " O.Khayaâm

          Commentaire


          • #6
            j ai lu son interview dans le new york times
            j avoue qu il m a refroidi

            s il est elu president il serait pour des frappes preventives(nucleaires?)contre l iran et la coree du nord...
            en gros contre tout pays qui ne veulent plus baisser l echine devant l imperialisme americain
            The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is.” Winston Churchill

            Commentaire


            • #7
              j ai lu son interview dans le new york times
              j avoue qu il m a refroidi

              s il est elu president il serait pour des frappes preventives(nucleaires?)contre l iran et la coree du nord...
              en gros contre tout pays qui ne veulent plus baisser l echine devant l imperialisme americain

              Bernie sanders a dit ca ...??
              " Je me rend souvent dans les Mosquées, Ou l'ombre est propice au sommeil " O.Khayaâm

              Commentaire


              • #8
                Bernie Sanders
                Senator from Vermont, 78

                1. Use of Force
                Presidents from both parties have taken an expansive view of their powers as commander in chief, deploying troops and ordering airstrikes without explicit congressional approval and, sometimes, without an imminent threat. The Democratic candidates frequently criticize such actions, but they have been less clear on the circumstances in which they would consider military force justifiable.

                Apart from responding to an attack on the United States or a treaty ally, what are the conditions under which you would consider the use of American military force?

                Sanders's Answer

                Bernie's first priority is to protect the American people. Military force is sometimes necessary, but always — always — as the last resort. And blustery threats of force can often signal weakness as much as strength, diminishing U.S. deterrence, credibility and security in the process. When Bernie is president, we will ensure that the United States pursues diplomacy over militarism to bring about peaceful, negotiated resolutions to conflicts around the world. If military force is necessary, Bernie will make sure he acts with appropriate congressional authorization, and only when he has determined that the benefits of military action outweigh the risks and costs.



                Would you consider military force for a humanitarian intervention?
                Sanders's Answer


                Yes.

                Would you consider military force to pre-empt an Iranian or North Korean nuclear or missile test?

                Sanders's Answer
                Yes.

                Would you consider military force to protect oil supplies?

                Sanders's Answer
                No.

                Is there any situation in which you could see yourself using American troops or covert action in a regime-change effort? If so, under what circumstances would you be willing to do that?

                Sanders's Answer
                No.

                Is it appropriate for the United States to provide nonmilitary support for regime-change efforts, as the Trump administration did in Venezuela?

                Sanders's Answer
                No.

                2. Iran

                In 2015, the Obama administration signed a deal with Iran that lifted sanctions in exchange for significant limits on Iran’s nuclear program. Many Republicans fiercely objected to the deal, saying it was not tough enough, and in 2018, President Trump abandoned it and reinstated sanctions. But Iran kept up its end of the agreement until last month, when Mr. Trump ordered the killing of a top Iranian general, Qassim Suleimani. The killing of General Suleimani brought the United States to the brink of war with Iran, which retaliated by attacking two military bases that American forces were using in Iraq.

                What would you do with the now-abandoned Iranian nuclear deal, as negotiated in 2015?

                Sanders's Answer
                Bernie would re-enter the deal with no new preconditions, provided Iran is also meeting its commitments. He would then pursue wider talks to resolve issues of ballistic missiles, support for terrorist groups, and human rights.

                Do you believe President Trump acted within his legal authority in giving the order to kill Qassim Suleimani? Was the killing justifiable? Was it wise?

                Sanders's Answer
                No. The U.S. is not at war with Iran, and Congress has not authorized any military action against Iran. Clearly there is evidence that Suleimani was involved in acts of terror. He also supported attacks on U.S. troops in Iraq. But the right question isn't "was this a bad guy," but rather "does assassinating him make Americans safer?" The answer is clearly no. Our forces are on higher alert because of this. We've sent even more troops to the region to deal with the heightened threat. And the Iraqi Parliament voted to kick our troops out, after we spent trillions of dollars and lost 4,500 brave soldiers there.



                Regarding possible future military action against Iran, is there any type of response that is off the table for you?

                Sanders's Answer
                Bernie would work with our European allies to de-escalate tensions with Iran and engage in aggressive diplomacy that would safeguard the security of the U.S. and our partners while preventing a disastrous war with Iran.

                What would your military strategy to deter Iran be? What would your diplomatic strategy be?

                Sanders's Answer
                Bernie would work with our European allies to de-escalate tensions with Iran and engage in aggressive diplomacy that would safeguard the security of the U.S. and our partners while preventing a disastrous war with Iran.

                3. North Korea
                Dismantling North Korea’s nuclear program has long been an American priority, and President Trump has tried to do so through unusual means: direct diplomacy with the North’s leader, Kim Jong-un. It started in Singapore in 2018 but began to fall apart last February, when Mr. Trump and Mr. Kim emerged from a summit meeting in Vietnam empty-handed. In the interim, sanctions have remained, the North’s arsenal of weapons fuel and missiles has steadily expanded, and Mr. Kim recently threatened to resume missile tests.

                Would you continue the personal diplomacy President Trump began with Kim Jong-un?
                Sanders's Answer
                Yes.

                Would you tighten sanctions until North Korea has given up all of its nuclear and missile programs?
                Sanders's Answer
                No.

                Would you gradually lift sanctions in return for a freeze on fissile material development, as President Clinton attempted?
                Sanders's Answer
                Yes.

                Would you insist on substantial disarmament before relieving any sanctions?
                Sanders's Answer
                No.

                Would you agree to begin withdrawing American troops from the Korean peninsula?
                Sanders's Answer
                No, not immediately. We would work closely with our South Korean partners to move toward peace on the Korean peninsula, which is the only way we will ultimately deal with the North Korean nuclear issue.

                Please describe your North Korea strategy further.
                Sanders's Answer
                Every step we take to reduce North Korea's nuclear force, to open it up to inspections, to end the 70-year-old Korean War and to encourage peaceful relations between the Koreas and the United States increases the chances of complete denuclearization of the peninsula. Peace and nuclear disarmament must proceed in parallel, in close consultations with our South Korean ally. I will work to negotiate a step-by-step process to roll back North Korea's nuclear program, build a new peace and security regime on the peninsula, and work toward the eventual elimination of all North Korean nuclear weapons.

                4. Afghanistan
                The war in Afghanistan, begun after the Sept. 11 attacks, is the longest war in United States history, and documents released in December revealed that three successive presidential administrations misled the American people about the progress — or lack thereof — being made on the ground. That the United States should withdraw has become a rare point of agreement between President Trump and Democrats. But there are still significant disagreements over when, and under what conditions, that withdrawal should happen.

                Would American troops be in Afghanistan at the end of your first term? If so, would you limit those troops' mission to counterterrorism and intelligence gathering?
                Sanders's Answer
                No.

                Would American presence in Afghanistan be dependent on other nations contributing troops on the ground?
                Sanders's Answer
                No.

                How long do you envision American troops being required, in any numbers, in Afghanistan?
                Sanders's Answer
                As president, Bernie would withdraw U.S. military forces from Afghanistan as expeditiously as possible. Bernie intends to have U.S. forces out of Afghanistan by the end of his first term. Our military has now been in Afghanistan for nearly 18 years. We will soon have troops in Afghanistan who were not even born on Sept. 11, 2001. It's time to end our intervention there and bring our troops home, in a planned and coordinated way combined with a serious diplomatic and political strategy which helps deliver desperately needed humanitarian aid. Withdrawing troops does not mean withdrawing all involvement, and my administration would stay politically engaged in these countries and do whatever we can to help them develop their economy and strengthen a government that is responsible to its people.
                The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is.” Winston Churchill

                Commentaire


                • #9
                  5. Israel
                  In Israel, a two-state solution — long viewed as the only workable end to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict — appears more distant than ever after President Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu embraced a plan that appeared to tilt the outcome in Israel’s favor. Mr. Trump’s decision in 2018 to move the United States Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem was deeply polarizing. So is the B.D.S. (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) movement, which has grown increasingly prominent and which the House condemned in a bipartisan resolution last year.

                  Should the United States maintain its current level of military aid to Israel? If not, how should the level of aid change?
                  Sanders's Answer
                  Yes, but that aid can be conditioned on Israel taking steps to end the occupation and move toward a peace agreement.

                  Bernie believes that U.S. aid should be conditioned on a range of human rights concerns. American taxpayers shouldn’t be supporting policies that undermine our values and interests, in Israel or anywhere. That’s why, when Bernie is president, he will use every tool at his disposal, including the conditioning of military aid, to create consequences for moves (such as settlements or annexation) that undermine the chances for peace.

                  When we talk about conditioning aid, it's important to note that this isn't about singling out Israel, it's about acting in an even-handed way in the region and making sure that American tax dollars do not go to supporting human rights abuses by any country.



                  Do you support the B.D.S. movement? If not, should the president and/or Congress act to hinder it?
                  Sanders's Answer
                  No. While Bernie is not a supporter of the B.D.S. movement, he believes that Americans have a constitutional right to participate in nonviolent protest.

                  Should the United States Embassy in Israel be moved from Jerusalem back to Tel Aviv?
                  Sanders's Answer
                  Not as a first step. But it would be on the table if Israel continues to take steps, such as settlement expansion, expulsions and home demolitions, that undermine the chances for a peace agreement.

                  Should all Palestinian refugees and their descendants have the right to return to Israel?
                  Sanders's Answer
                  The right of refugees to return to their homes after the cessation of hostilities is an internationally recognized right, but this issue will be negotiated between Israelis and Palestinians as part of a peace agreement.

                  Do you support the establishment of a Palestinian state that includes West Bank land as demarcated by pre-1967 borders, except for longtime Israeli settlements?
                  Sanders's Answer
                  Yes, if the settlement issue is negotiated between Israelis and Palestinians.

                  If you answered yes to the last question, what will you do to achieve that where past administrations have failed? If you answered no, what solution do you envision to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?
                  Sanders's Answer
                  When it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, credible United States leadership is desperately needed. Bernie is a strong supporter of the right of Israel to exist in independence, peace and security. But he also believes that the United States needs to engage in an even-handed approach toward that longstanding conflict, which results in ending the Israeli occupation and enabling the Palestinian people to have independence and self-determination in a sovereign, independent, economically viable state of their own. In his view, that end result would be in the best interests of Israel, the Palestinian people, the United States and the entire region.

                  The parameters of a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are well known. They are based in international law, in multiple United Nations Security Council resolutions, and are supported by an overwhelming international consensus: two states based on the 1967 lines, with Jerusalem as the capital of both states. Ultimately, it's up to the Palestinians and Israelis themselves to make the choices necessary for a final agreement, but the United States has a major role to play in brokering that agreement.

                  As president, Bernie will put real pressure on both sides, including conditioning aid. The U.S. gives a lot of aid to both Israel and the Palestinians, and it's totally appropriate to withhold that aid when they do things we don't like.

                  When we are in the White House, we will restore funds to U.N.R.W.A., a major element of U.S. efforts to reach a peaceful solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Bernie will call upon Israel to end policies that violate international humanitarian law, such as home demolitions and settlement construction in the occupied territories, and work to ensure that U.S. aid is not used to support these activities. Bernie will also continue to condemn violence against civilians by all sides.



                  6. Russia
                  Russia has been a deeply destabilizing force on the world stage for several years, including through its annexation of Crimea from Ukraine in 2014 and its meddling in the United States’ 2016 presidential election. After it annexed Crimea, it was suspended from the Group of Eight bloc of industrialized nations (now, in Russia’s absence, the Group of Seven). But President Trump has pushed to readmit Russia to the G-7 and has held several meetings with President Vladimir Putin, the contents of which have not been disclosed.

                  If Russia continues on its current course in Ukraine and other former Soviet states, should the United States regard it as an adversary, or even an enemy?
                  Sanders's Answer
                  Yes.

                  Should Russia be required to return Crimea to Ukraine before it is allowed back into the G-7?
                  Sanders's Answer
                  Yes.

                  7. China
                  The Chinese government has been systematically persecuting Muslim minorities: separating families, subjecting Uighurs and Kazakhs to forced labor and operating internment camps. It is also embroiled in a political crisis over Hong Kong, a special administrative region of China. At the same time, President Trump has taken a hard line on trade with China, imposing economically damaging tariffs. Last month, the United States and China signed an initial trade deal.

                  Should respect for Hong Kong’s political independence, under the terms of the handover agreement with Britain, be a prerequisite for normal relations and trade with China?
                  Sanders's Answer
                  Yes.

                  Should normal relations and trade be contingent on China’s closing its internment camps for Uighurs and other Muslim minority groups?
                  Sanders's Answer
                  Yes.

                  8. NATO
                  The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, a military alliance among 29 North American and European countries, has been a linchpin of the United States’ foreign policy for decades. But President Trump has often criticized the alliance, arguing that the United States gives too much and gets too little from it. During his 2016 campaign, he refused to commit to NATO’s central pledge — defending other members if they are attacked — if the members in question had not met their spending commitments, and aides say that in 2018, he repeatedly suggested withdrawing. Last year, NATO agreed to reduce the United States’ contribution and increase Germany’s.

                  Should NATO nations pay more for defense than their current commitment of at least 2 percent of G.D.P.?
                  Sanders's Answer
                  No.

                  Should nations that do not fulfill their NATO funding commitment still receive an assurance of United States aid if they are attacked?
                  Sanders's Answer
                  Yes.

                  9. Cyber Policy
                  Cyber weaponry has emerged as the primary way nations compete with and undercut each other in short-of-war conflict. Yet there are few international rules that govern the daily battles — or prevent escalation. As a shadow war emerges in cyberspace, President Trump has given far more powers to the United States Cyber Command and the National Security Agency.

                  Should a presidential order be required to launch a cyber strike against another country, just as it is required to launch a nuclear strike?
                  Sanders's Answer
                  Yes.

                  The United States Cyber Command’s new strategy is “persistent engagement,” meaning the U.S. goes deep inside foreign computer networks to constantly engage with adversaries and dissuade strikes on the United States. Would you continue this policy?
                  Sanders's Answer
                  Bernie would undertake a comprehensive review of U.S. cyber strategy and work to bring countries together around international conventions to control the use of these dangerous weapons.

                  If you answered yes to the last question, would you nevertheless insist that other nations pursuing “persistent engagement” could not be inside American power grids and other critical infrastructure?
                  Sanders's Answer
                  Not applicable.

                  10. National Security Strategy
                  In the post-Cold War era — and especially after the Sept. 11 attacks — the focal point of American foreign policy moved to counterterrorism, the Middle East and Afghanistan. President Trump has, at least on paper, argued for shifting American foreign policy back to confront the “revisionist powers” of Russia and China.

                  President Trump’s national security strategy calls for shifting the focus of American foreign policy away from the Middle East and Afghanistan, and back to what it refers to as the “revisionist” superpowers, Russia and China. Do you agree? Why or why not?

                  Sanders's Answer
                  Despite its stated strategy, the Trump administration has never followed a coherent national security strategy. In fact, Trump has escalated tensions in the Middle East and put us on the brink of war with Iran, refused to hold Russia accountable for its interference in our elections and human rights abuses, has done nothing to address our unfair trade agreement with China that only benefits wealthy corporations, and has ignored China's mass internment of Uighurs and its brutal repression of protesters in Hong Kong. Clearly, Trump is not a president we should be taking notes from.

                  As the wealthiest and most powerful nation on earth, we have got to help lead the struggle to defend and expand a rules-based international order in which law, not might, makes right. When Bernie is president, we will leverage our position as a world power to combat the rise of the international authoritarian axis, and work to build a coalition that mobilizes behind a vision of shared prosperity, security and dignity for all people.



                  11. Top Diplomatic Priority
                  The next president will be confronted with an array of foreign policy challenges, from North Korea’s nuclear program to international efforts to combat climate change. It will not be possible to address all of them at once. This makes it essential to understand not only the candidates’ policies, but also their priorities.

                  What would be your top priority for your secretary of state?

                  Sanders's Answer
                  Bernie has long believed that the U.S. must lead the world in improving international cooperation to address shared challenges. That's why, together with his secretary of state, Bernie's administration will implement a foreign policy which focuses on democracy, human rights, environmental justice and economic fairness. Leading an international effort against the urgent threat of climate change will be a top priority.

                  When Bernie is president, we will reverse Trump's assault on diplomacy. For example, while China expands its diplomatic footprint around the world, the U.S.'s is shrinking. More than 25 percent of the State Department's key positions remain vacant. We will make recruitment for the State Department and the rebuilding of our professional diplomatic corps a priority. Investing more in diplomacy, development and conflict prevention upstream can prevent the need for military intervention downstream. Starving diplomacy and foreign aid now will result in greater military defense needs later on.





                  HOW THE TIMES CONDUCTED THIS PROJECT
                  In December, we sent a questionnaire to the 14 Democratic presidential candidates who were then in the race. Eleven completed it, including two — Cory Booker and Marianne Williamson — who subsequently dropped out of the race.
                  John Delaney (who has also since dropped out) and Tulsi Gabbard did not respond, and Pete Buttigieg answered only some of the questions. The Times will update this graphic if any of them provide additional answers.
                  — Maggie Astor and David Sanger

                  PRODUCED BY
                  Michael Beswetherick
                  EDITED BY
                  Jonathan Ellis
                  The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is.” Winston Churchill

                  Commentaire

                  Chargement...
                  X