Annonce

Réduire
Aucune annonce.

Image d'Algerie: "The logic of massacres in Algeria: wanton and sensless?"

Réduire
X
 
  • Filtre
  • Heure
  • Afficher
Tout nettoyer
nouveaux messages

  • Image d'Algerie: "The logic of massacres in Algeria: wanton and sensless?"


    Pascal CONVERT, La Madone de Bentalha, 2001-2002, sculpture inspirée de la photographie d'Hocine Zaouar, prise en Algérie en 1997.

    Il y a dix ans, le massacre de Bentalha. Par devoir de memoire et afin que nul n oublie cette tragedie je vous suggere une lecture interessante expliquant le phenomene de la violence de masse en Algerie.

    "The Logic of massacres is Algeria: Wanton and sensless?" est une analyse du cas algerien par Stathis N. Kalyvas, un academicien et specialiste de violence de masse et de massacres de civils. C'est une etude universitaire loin des vues et opinions fragmentaires, propagandistes et dénuées de maitrise scientifique du sujet que nous livrent ca et là la presse et certaines voix peu credibles.

    Extrait: " Civil wars typically take the form of guerrilla warfare. Their key
    element is civilians: winning is to a large extent contingent on civilian
    support.7 Competing political actors (incumbents and insurgents, but
    particularly the latter) need to attract and maintain civilian support.
    Although civilians have political preferences, their overarching priority
    in the context of a deadly war is to remain alive. Practically, this means
    that political actors will try to commit civilians on their side by providing
    benefits (such as land distribution) and sanctions (such as attaching
    a high cost to defection to the opponent) (Taylor 1988). In general, sanctions
    are cheaper than benefits. Periods of intense military conflict (as
    opposed to calmer periods) reduce the availability of benefits, turning
    survival into the key benefit; during such periods, political actors are
    likely to resort to terror in order to shape civilian behavior and reduce
    the probability of defection.8 In other words, they will try to alter the
    expected (dis)utility of defection (the probability that an individual
    defection will be sanctioned and the intensity of the sanction). Valuing
    survival, most civilians will respond by cooperating with the political
    actor who makes the most credible threats.
    To be efficient, terror needs to be selective;..."

    http://research.yale.edu/stathis/files/Wanton.pdf
    Dernière modification par saamatic, 25 septembre 2007, 06h01.
Chargement...
X