L’ "American Entreprise Institute" classe l’Algérie comme un fuur foyer d’instabilité

[upup]

Dans une étude de l’ « Americain Entreprise Institute », signée par Michael Rubin, un ancien formateur militaire au Pentagone, l’Algérie est classée parmi "les nouveaux foyers de conflits dans le monde".

L’AE (Institut de l'entreprise américaine pour la recherche sur les politiques publiques) classe l’Algérie comme le troisième pays après la Mauritanie avec un fort risque d’instabilité dans un futur proche.

Le think tank américain, fondé en 1943, explique son analyse par plusieurs indicateurs négatifs, parmi lesquels "le sud algérien qui représente un refuge pour le groupe terroriste armé AQMI" où circule une quantité inquiétante d’armes et de drogue.

L’autre point alarmant, l'instabilité politique du pays et les problèmes de "succession non réglés à la tête de l’Etat" sont également soulignés dans ce rapport. Une situation qui devrait conduire les islamistes à vouloir reprendre la main après de longues années d'exclusion, selon ce document.

Le rapport conseille à la future administration américaine de prendre ses dispositions pour faire face aux conséquences géopolitiques que créeront ces zones de conflits.


Atlas info Point. Fr

[hakimcasa]

les problèmes de "succession non réglés à la tête de l’Etat"

Sur ce point, les américains se trompent. Le problème de succession est déjà réglé en Algérie.

Les américains se trompent peut être parce que leur cerveau ne peut concevoir que Bouteflika puisse succéder à lui-même une 5è fois, une 6è fois, une 7è fois... autant de fois qu'il faudra jusqu’à ce que mort s'ensuive.

[ROUICHDA]

Partie de l'article supprimée?
"Le Maroc, la Mauritanie et l'Algérie s'exposent à la violence et risquent d'être la destination de la deuxième vague du Printemps arabe", indique le centre, ajoutant que la Mauritanie était le pays le plus menacé par les troubles.

[upup]

Rouichida,

Tu voulais dire les Maldives, la mauritanie et l algerie...

[hakimcasa]

Partie de l'article supprimée?
"Le Maroc, la Mauritanie et l'Algérie s'exposent à la violence et risquent d'être la destination de la deuxième vague du Printemps arabe", indique le centre, ajoutant que la Mauritanie était le pays le plus menacé par les troubles.

Ce n'est pas vrai. Je viens de consulter l'article sur le site de l'AEI. La partie de l'article que vous prétendez avoir été supprimée n'existe pas. Vous l'avez inventé et ça ce n'est pas honnête. Le Maroc n'est pas évoqué dans l'article de Michael Rubin.

[ROUICHDA]

Le nuage Tchernobyl? qu'est le printemps arabe ou l'état islamique s'arrête à la frontière marocaine,on a beaucoup rit à l'époque en France.

[Spoutnik]

Le nuage Tchernobyl? qu'est le printemps arabe ou l'état islamique s'arrête à la frontière marocaine,on a beaucoup rit à l'époque en France.

Peut-etre, mais il n'empeche que vous etes une pathetique menteuse.

[ROUICHDA]

Salam SPOUTNIK
Rubin is closely associated with neoconservatism. His track record includes working for a number of groups associated with the U.S. “Israel lobby” (including AEI, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and the Middle East Forum), championing the U.S. invasion of Iraq, suggesting assassinating foreign leaders like Iranian President Mahmoud
QUI EST LE MENTEUR
Vous n'êtes pas à la hauteur pour salir l'Algérie.

[annabideparis]

Comment peut-on être manipulateur a ce point?
L'article qui mentionne le Maroc dans liste existe bel et bien,mais comme certains sont devenu maître dans la manipulation ils ont trouves un autre article ou c'est les Maldives qui remplaces le Maroc?

J'ai moi même répondu dans ce topic. Je vais essayer de le retrouver.

L’AE (Institut de l'entreprise américaine pour la recherche sur les politiques publiques) classe l’Algérie comme le troisième pays après la Mauritanie avec un fort risque d’instabilité dans un futur proche.

Pourquoi il nous met pas la liste?Mais comme c'es la propagande,c'est normal.

[hakimcasa]

Rubin is closely associated with neoconservatism. His track record includes working for a number of groups associated with the U.S. “Israel lobby” (including AEI, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and the Middle East Forum), championing the U.S. invasion of Iraq, suggesting assassinating foreign leaders like Iranian President Mahmoud
QUI EST LE MENTEUR
Vous n'êtes pas à la hauteur pour salir l'Algérie.

Stop !

Là vous nous sortez autre chose. Votre lien renvoie vers The Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) alors que l'article du topic revoie vers American Entreprise Institute (AEI).

Donc quand vous prétendez que dans l'article de l'AEI, le passage évoquant le Maroc a été supprimé, vous voulez nous induire en erreur et ce n'est pas honnête.

[Osvaldo]

Comment peut-on être manipulateur a ce point?
L'article qui mentionne le Maroc dans liste existe bel et bien,mais comme certains sont devenu maître dans la manipulation ils ont trouves un autre article ou c'est les Maldives qui remplaces le Maroc?

Ten countries whose stability can’t be taken for granted

As George W. Bush and Al Gore debated prior to the 2000 elections, neither Iraq nor Afghanistan merited serious mention. Eight years later, neither Barack Obama nor John McCain foresaw chaos in Syria and Libya. Political science is heavy on the political and light on science. Area studies specialists failed to predict the Islamic Revolution in Iran, the fall of the Soviet Union, or the Arab Spring. Policymakers are much more comfortable second-guessing what they saw in the rearview mirror than gazing over the horizon. Simply put, the world is unpredictable and the chief concerns for the next administration might be barely a blip on the radar today.

Putting aside existing conflicts in Libya, Syria, Yemen, the South China Sea, and Ukraine, what crises could blindside the White House in the next four years? Here are ten countries and potential crises that should certainly be on the next administration’s radar screen:

The Maldives. Let’s start small. Few Americans know the Maldives, but those who do likely think of the low-lying Indian Ocean archipelago as the archetypal tropical island paradise. Outside of the gated resorts, however, Islamist radicalism has been taking root. The Maldivian government has sought US assistance, but the 3 a.m. phone call has now been ringing unanswered for several years. Might the Islamic State seize Western tourists on the island? What would a radical government willing to accept arms and foreign jihadis mean for trans-Indian Ocean shipping? The Maldives might be isolated and far from US shores but isn’t that what analysts once said of Afghanistan?

Mauritania. Africa has largely been a success story over the past 20 years, but several countries put that progress at risk. Take Mauritania, for example. European terror analysts regularly list Mauritania as perhaps their top, under-the-radar concern. The impoverished country on the Atlantic coast of Africa has the population of Phoenix, Arizona, spread over an area twice the size of California. An Islamic Republic, it is one of the last countries to embrace slavery in practice if not in law. Its largely ungoverned interior has become the domain of smugglers and a safe-haven for terrorists. Loose weaponry from Libya has only poured fuel on the fire. In many ways, Mauritania has become pre-9/11 Afghanistan, just without the diplomatic attention.

Algeria. Africa’s largest country, Algeria should also be one of its wealthiest. But decades of military rule, statist economic policies, and a devastating civil war in the 1990s have taken their toll. Now, southern Algeria is a haven for Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb. Ailing President Abdelaziz Bouteflika, Algeria’s long-time strongman, will likely not last out the next four years. There is no clear succession and, even if a president does consolidate political control, he will have to face down Islamic radicals who might seek to avenge their long suppression. One Libya has been destabilizing enough. Another so close to Europe could herald disaster.

Ethiopia. Two and a half times the size of California, Ethiopia is one of the world’s oldest countries but, despite an increasingly autocratic and repressive leadership projecting an aura of stability, it looks like it could be among the world’s most fragile states. While the economy has grown rapidly, poverty remains the rule as the population also booms. The agricultural basis of the economy makes Ethiopia susceptible to drought. State-dominated industries mean it competes poorly with the outside world. The country is incredibly diverse. In 1991, Eritrea successfully seceded after a decades-long civil war. While Eritrea had its own colonial heritage, many other ethnic groups are as resentful of Addis Ababa’s control and, specifically, ethnic Tigrean domination. Of greater concern, however, is Ethiopia’s sectarian division. Muslims already represent a third of the population and are growing at a faster rate than the Ethiopian Christian population. Should ethnic and sectarian divisions erupt into open conflict, the resulting insecurity could make Somalia look like Club Med.

Nigeria. Concerns about stability in Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, hit international headlines in 2014 when Boko Haram kidnapped hundreds of school girls in order to convert them forcibly to Islam and marry them off to militants. But that’s only one of many problems Nigeria faces. Boko Haram has thrived against the backdrop of endemic corruption. By some estimates, Nigeria has lost $400 billion to embezzlement and corruption since 1960, more than total international aid to Africa during the same period. While the international community has largely eradicated piracy off the coast of Somalia, the problem has skyrocketed in the Gulf of Guinea, and even that is underreported since states don’t always report seizures in their territorial waters. Like Ethiopia, Nigeria faces not only ethnic but sectarian divisions. Tensions between Muslims and Christians plunged the Ivory Coast into civil war in the last decade; Nigeria is far more volatile. If its fragile democracy fails, West Africa may see a conflict worse than any it has seen in decades.

Turkey. What would it mean if a NATO ally collapsed? Over the past decade, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has seized dictatorial power. He called the aborted July 15 coup “a gift from God” and used it as an excuse to declare a state of emergency and purge more than 100,000 military officers and civil servants. But there are indications that there could be more violence on the horizon. Doğu Perinçek, a former Maoist turned ultra-nationalist power-broker, leads a shadowy group Turks simply refer to as “the Perinçek group.” Some suggest that Perinçek is Turkey’s real defense minister, behind-the-scenes. In August, Erdoğan hired Adnan Tanriverdi, a former Special Forces trainer close to Perinçek, to be counsel for the president. The question is whether those Tanriverdi trains will be more loyal to Perinçek or Erdoğan when the next blow comes. Regardless, Erdoğan may be a marked man and even if he is killed or forcibly removed, he has so eviscerated the Turkish state that political chaos will likely follow his death.

Russia. Like Turkey, Russia is ruled by a strongman who has substituted the illusion of stability for its substance. When President Vladimir Putin dies, the Russian people will have to pay the price for his decades of corruption and mismanagement. Putin’s lasting legacy will be the vacuum of power underneath him. Beyond poor governance, however, Russia will soon face reverberation from its demographic crisis. Its Muslim population is growing as its ethnic Russian population shrinks. At the same time, it faces Islamist radicalism not only in Chechnya and Daghestan, but also increasingly among ethnic Tartars. Here’s the question: As Muslims make up a growing proportion of the conscript-age population, can Russia count on its own army in any sectarian conflict? (On all these issues, the writings of Leon Aron and Anna Borshchevskaya are must-reads).

Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia’s facing a perfect storm: US policy has empowered and re-resourced Iran. The price of oil has declined precipitously pushing the Saudi economy to the brink. Saudi Arabia is bogged down in a war in Yemen which seemingly has no end. All of this would be bad in the best of circumstances, but add into the mix a king that very well may have Alzheimer’s and the Kingdom may face a crisis unlike any it has faced in decades. Every US administration since Franklin Roosevelt’s has counted on a strong partnership with Saudi Arabia kingdom to bring stability to the Middle East and order to the world economy. If Riyadh is unable or unwilling to continue that partnership, can Washington find a substitute or fill the gap?

Jordan. Even more than Saudi Arabia, the United States has relied on Jordan for generations. The Hashemite Kingdom is perhaps America’s closest Arab ally. But Jordan is in crisis today, even if the Jordanian government will not admit it. With the influx of Syrians, Jordan has now absorbed its third major wave of refugees, putting tremendous strain on the economy. King Abdullah II is far more popular in Washington and London than he is in some corners of his own kingdom. And while Western journalists depict Queen Rania as a romantic and popular figure, she is widely disliked inside Jordan for her profligate spending. All of this has created fertile ground for the Islamic State to infiltrate Jordan even if it keeps its presence low-key. Should he United States and its Iraqi and Kurdish allies push the Islamic State out of Iraq and Syria and lead more of its fighters to enter Jordan, then the assault on Mosul and Raqqa might truly be Pyrrhic.

China. Last but not least China, the world’s most populous country. Some pundits have watched China’s economic boom and sung its praises, even suggesting that the communist republic’s dictatorial ways might be superior to those of the United States. Economic development is uneven: coastal, urban incomes are exponentially higher than interior, rural incomes. The legacy of decades of China’s murderous one-child policy are still to come as China faces a demographic precipice. My colleagues Dan Blumenthal and Derek Scissors highlight the implications of stagnation in China. Simply put, future US administrations should worry less about the rise of China and more about its decline. Will a faltering China, for example, lash out militarily as a stagnating Russia has?

The world is a dangerous place. These scenarios may be too obscure for the 2016 presidential debates, but ensuring the ability of the United States to react to them should not be.

[hakimcasa]

Merci Osvaldo. C'est celui-là l'article du fil ouvert par upup.

[ROUICHDA]

Salam Hakimcasa
Un peu de politesse,vous vous prenez pour qui pour dire Stop.
L'Honnêteté intellectuelle, c'est dans les deux camps?
Ne montez pas sur vos grands chevaux,je me fous de la forme c'est le fond qui m'importe?
Vous n'êtes pas ,à vous lire, un parangon,de cette honnêteté.

[Pecos]

on brûle, vous brûlez avec nous

[annabideparis]

Merci pour la liste.
Donc la Russie,L'Arabie saoudite et la chine rien que ça?
Et on se focalise sur l’Algérie,c'est vrai que si la chine et la Russie sont déstabilisé il ne se passera rien?
Par ex si l'Arabie saoudite est déstabilisé,le Maroc n'en subira pas les conséquences?

Ah oui,nous on a le sud et AQMi et blabla.C'est bien,sinon la drogue n'est pas déstabilisatrice?